例句與造句

1. Ottawa argued that the patent exhaustion doctrine shielded it from liability.
2. Unlike the analogous first-sale doctrine in copyright, the patent exhaustion doctrine has not been codified into the patent statute, and is thus still a common law doctrine.
3. Procedurally, the patent exhaustion doctrine operates as an affirmative defense, shielding authorized purchasers from infringement claims concerning the sale or use ( including repair and modification ) of a patented product after the patent owner authorized its sale.
4. Since its development by the courts in the late 19th century, the patent exhaustion doctrine has raised questions regarding the scope of exclusive rights granted by patents and the extent to which a patent owner may extend those rights to control downstream use and sales of patented articles.
5. In the course of restating the patent exhaustion doctrine, the Court held that the exhaustion doctrine is triggered by, among other things, an authorized sale of a component when the only reasonable and intended use of the component is to practice the patent and the component substantially embodies the patented invention by embodying its essential features.
6. It's difficult to find patent exhaustion doctrine in a sentence. 用patent exhaustion doctrine造句挺難的
7. ""'Bowman v . Monsanto Co . " "', 569 U . S . _ _ _ ( 2013 ) was a United States Supreme Court patent decision in which the Court unanimously affirmed the decision of the patent exhaustion doctrine does not permit a farmer to plant and grow saved, patented seeds without the patent owner's permission.
8. The court held that the patent exhaustion doctrine did not apply when a patentee sold a patented product subject to a condition other than a price fix or tie in, unless " the patentee has ventured beyond the patent grant and into behavior having an anticompetitive effect not justifiable under the rule of reason . " Despite the sweeping language of cases such as " Motion Picture Patents Co . v . Universal Film Mfg . Co . ", the court held that the Supreme Court had only held post-sale restrictions invalid in price-fixing and tie-in cases, and therefore the general language outlawing post-sale restrictions was merely " obiter dicta " that could be ignored.